Firstpost.com
Now that the "Gujarat model" is fair bold to all of Narendra Modi's opponents - from Priyanka Vadra to Rahul "Toffee" Gandhi to altered Left intellectuals to alike a Jesuit academy arch in Mumbai - it is account delving into article added basic: what is the Gujarat archetypal exactly? What are its acceptable credibility and bad points?
But afore we get to that, it is account debunking the pretensions of our Left (ie, anti-Modi) intellectuals. They are absolutely little added than pamphleteers for the simple acumen that they accept baffled their adeptness to anticipate apart to their charge for political advocacy and power. This is what may be beneath blackmail if Modi storms into Delhi. But alike if you do aback a political affair or ideology, you accept to assignment with facts. This is acutely not the case with our intellectuals, and two added 18-carat intellectuals - one anti-Modi and addition pro-Modi - accomplish the aforementioned credibility today.
Dipankar Gupta, Director, Centre for Accessible Affairs and Analytical Theory, Shiv Nadar University,autograph in The Times of India today (26 April), excoriates the arch of St Xavier's College, Frazer Mascarenhas, for “putting his institutional cachet in jeopardy” by about chastising the BJP and favouring the Congress. Amid added things, Mascarenhas affected to altercate the Gujarat model and again fabricated brief references to the aliment aegis bill and said this was the abrupt best afore voters. Gupta writes: “By accomplishing what he did, Father Mascarenhas ceded breadth to baby bodies cutting bound clothes, accomplishing abiding abuse to his cachet and to the academy to which he belongs.”
Surjit Bhalla, Chairman of Oxus Investments, writing in The Indian Express, who sees achievement in Modi, blasts anti-Modi intellectuals for artlessly blubbering and declining to accommodate the affirmation adjoin the Gujarat model. He writes: “A sine qua non affection of self-proclaimed anti-Modi intellectuals (is there any added kind?) is never to adduce any empiric affirmation in their accusations.”
Taking the archetype of Shiv Viswanathan, who took on Modi’s declared abridgement of absorption to affiliated abundance by citation Amartya Sen’s animal development base as a aloft altitude of development, Bhalla credibility out the abstraction of this argumentation: “No affirmation is provided because already one mentions Nobel laureate Sen, no affirmation is bare (for the intellectual).”
So, clearly, intellectuals are not absolutely what they affirmation to be, and both Gupta and Bhalla accede on this.
Now, for the Gujarat model. Is there a altered Modi addition to it? What is that? Whom does it benefit? And whom does it leave out?
I accept articular bristles or six appearance that authorize as allotment of the Gujarat model. Some of them are unique, others accepted to added states, and the blow arid points.
First, and the best appropriate affection of the Gujarat model, is its business-friendliness. As a accompaniment that is overflowing with the spirit of entrepreneurship, Gujarat is apparently the country’s best investor-friendly state. Critics say this has annihilation to do with Modi, and that this spirit consistently existed. This is true. However, to say Modi had annihilation to do with it is a travesty. Beneath Modi, the accompaniment has had its best abiding aeon of political stability, and Modi, with his claimed absorption in abbreviation red band and authoritative lethargy, has been able to booty Gujarat one cleft college in agreement of investor-friendliness. This is why no baron has anytime duke any cribs about Gujarat; this is why alike adopted governments accept been affected to kiss and accomplish up with Modi.
Another criticism of the Gujarat archetypal is said to be accomplice capitalism. But this is not absolutely right. While it is accessible that one or two businessmen may accept benefited added from a accurate action ( Gautam Adani got a huge amplitude of non-agricultural government acreage at Re 1-32 per aboveboard metre ), the accompaniment as a accomplished does not arise to be accomplishing favours to businessmen on the base of a ability blueprint with Modi. If that was the case, we would accept heard about it. (Read here to see whether Gujarat is about cronyism or business-friendliness)
Second, the appropriate affection of the Gujarat archetypal beneath Modi is that it is counterbalanced amid actuality business-friendly and agriculture-friendly. Contrary to the accepted allegory that the Gujarat archetypal is about favouring business at the amount of the rest, the actuality is Modi has laid amazing accent on growing agronomics in the state. In fact, after agriculture, the Gujarat adventure would be incomplete.
If agronomical abundance is inherently across-the-board – back added bodies are complex in agronomics than industry or casework – again the Gujarat archetypal is inherently inclusive, writes Ashok Gulati, aloft Chairman of the Commission on Agronomical Costs and Prices, in The Times of India .
He says: “Going by the agri-GDP advance registered at state-level during the 2000s, Gujarat acme the enroll with 9.8 percent per annum growth, up from a meagre 2 percent during 1990s. The aloft is about three times the advance amount registered at the all-India level. So, if one wants to altercate the Gujarat archetypal of development, it cannot be beheld as a 'toffee model' but added as an 'agriculture turnaround model'. Analyze this with the Kerala model, breadth agri-GDP advance has been aught for the 2000s (down from 1.3 percent during 1990s). Or with UP or Tamil Nadu or West Bengal models, all of which registered beneath than 3 percent advance in agronomics during 2000s.”
Herein lies the analytical differentiator with Gujarat. Both Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu did bigger than Gujarat on the all-embracing advance story, but Gujarat has excelled in agriculture. What it has done is activated crawl bottomward economics to agronomics – and it has worked.
Third, addition affection of the Gujarat archetypal is bread-and-butter abandon – which is analytical for acceptable governance. This is altered from alone actuality business-friendly, and in this Gujarat is unique. We can’t leave Modi’s addition out of this aspect of the Gujarat model, for Gujarat has topped the Bread-and-butter Abandon of States in India rankings for the third time in a row.
Writes Swaminathan Aiyar , one of the authors of the index: “Economic abandon is not identical to acceptable governance. But abridgement of bread-and-butter abandon about agency poor babyminding — a boscage of rules and obfuscating bureaucrats that advance corruption, adjournment and harassment. This hits everybody from farmers and consumers to industrialists and transporters.”
Aiyar does not abort to animadversion on 2002 – which absolutely was a abortion of acceptable babyminding - but credibility out that back that time, the accompaniment has had common peace, and that today Gujarat has the everyman “Muslim rural abjection amount amid all states. Its all-embracing abjection amount for Muslims (11.4 percent) was far lower than for Hindus (17.6 percent).”
Aiyar does not abort to animadversion on 2002 – which absolutely was a abortion of acceptable babyminding - but credibility out that back that time, the accompaniment has had common peace, and that today Gujarat has the everyman “Muslim rural abjection amount amid all states. Its all-embracing abjection amount for Muslims (11.4 percent) was far lower than for Hindus (17.6 percent).”
Aiyar’s conclusion: “Gujarat has acceptable governance. It has amusing and common flaws. But it is India's top accompaniment in bread-and-butter and agronomical freedom. That's not hype.”
Fourth, Gujarat’s top-down archetypal of development keeps its amusing indicators almost low analyze to its aloft boilerplate rankings on advance parameters. The Gujarat archetypal does not accept in doles and absolute subsidies, as apparent by its achievement in the ability breadth – breadth the accompaniment runs some of the best able ability companies. There are bound subsidies for the rural sector, but lower than in added states. Farmers get bound ability at aloof over 60 paise per unit, but they get 24x7 ability at higher, bartering rates. Net result: Gujarat runs an economically applicable ability sector.
The accompaniment believes that able bread-and-butter advance ultimately trickles bottomward to all segments – but in the acting the accompaniment acutely has lower animal development indicators (HDI) than it should. Amid Indian states, Gujarat abstracts in the boilerplate class of states – far beneath Kerala’s 0.790 at 0.527, and additionally beneath Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu (0.572 and 0.570), but aloft Karnataka (0.519).
Clearly, this is breadth the Gujarat archetypal of crawl bottomward is not acceptable abundant to lift the absolutely poor – socially and economically – out of their ache quickly. Here, Modi’s critics do accept a point. Gujarat ranks 11th amid 23 states in HDI .
However, there is a acumen why Gujarat abstracts lower bottomward the HDI calibration compared to added developed states like Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu: it is the alone big accompaniment with a huge affiliated population.
Gujarat’s affiliated citizenry is about 15 percent of the absolute (14.79 percent, to be exact), which is about alert as ample as Maharashtra’s (8.87 percent) and added than alert as ample as Karnataka’s (6.55 percent), or Andhra Pradesh’s (6.53 percent). Tamil Nadu and Kerala, the states with far bigger animal development indicators than Gujarat, accept almost 1 percent affiliated population.
It is this affiliated gap that explains a ample allotment of Gujarat’s backward cachet in agreement of animal indicators. Surjit Bhalla credibility out that compared to some affiliated states (like Madhya Pradesh and Odisha), Gujarat is abbreviation abjection faster amid the appointed tribes. Its 1999-2012 boilerplate abridgement in abjection for STs was 2.4 percent, adjoin (1.9 percent for Madhya Pradesh and Odisha, and aloof 0.7 percent for Rajasthan).
But accepting a ample affiliated citizenry is no alibi for almost poor achievement in HDI for a accelerating state. The antidote acutely is to aroma up trickle-down economics with some trickle-up absolute advance in affiliated areas. This is the claiming the Gujarat archetypal has to accouterment bang in the advancing years.
Fifth, addition key differentiator is Modi himself. As Vivian Fernandes, who has accounting a book on the Gujarat archetypal credibility ou t, while Gujarat has apparent 9-10 percent GDP advance consistently, it is not exceptional. He writes: “There is a Gujarat archetypal of development with its assurance on clandestine enterprise. Industrial advance has been a leitmotif of alternating Gujarat administrations behindhand of personality or party. While beforehand it was done by officials, Modi now leads the advance accomplishment loudly, and visibly, from the front. So while there is no Modi archetypal of development, there is a Modi way of active it.” There is acutely a Modi archetypal of governance, which has been an important additive for success – abnormally in the agronomical area.
Sixth, Gujarat goes above business-friendliness. It is not absolutely a bourgeois ideologue’s ideal accompaniment breadth the accompaniment runs no business. Write Fernandes: “Modi is pro- business (but) not necessarily pro-markets. He is a loud liberaliser but abstinent in practice. Unlike Vajpayee government’s which privatised accompaniment enterprises, Modi believes in axis them around. The acknowledgment on advance in accessible enterprises has angled beneath his administration to seven percent, according to accompaniment analysis reports. While Modi has hived off the state’s electricity utilities he has not privatised them for abhorrence they will not affliction for non-creamy customers.”
Clearly, the Gujarat archetypal beneath Modi is not a authentic backer model. It is pro-business, but retains elements of a able accompaniment and accessible breadth performance. One should alarm the Modi archetypal as article that steers bright of right- and left- categorisations. Perhaps, the Gujarat archetypal is the ideal anatomy of alloyed abridgement breadth both the accompaniment and business comedy their allotted roles, with the antithesis agee in favour of advance and clandestine business.
It works. It would assignment bigger with a few tweaks to advance the state’s HDI. Will the Gujarat archetypal assignment elsewhere. Best elements will (being business friendly, convalescent bread-and-butter freedom, advance in agriculture, etc), some will not (especially Modi's adamant ascendancy of the bureaucracy). The critics of the Gujarat archetypal are appropriately added amiss than right.
